As the world continues to face challenges from conflicts and instability, it is important to carefully consider all possible solutions before deciding on military intervention. Overall, this argument is based on the premises of the just war theory which postulates that a military action be justified when it is necessary to stop injustice (Al-Haj, 2013). Continue with Recommended Cookies. He also served as the deputy special Middle East coordinator for Arab-Israeli negotiations, a senior member of the State Department's policy planning staff, in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research and in the Office of the Historian. This is a good argument for humanitarian interventions as helps to prevent further atrocities whilst also bringing some justice to victims. After the debate, those who agreed and disagreed with the motion were tied, at 45 percent each. Kerton-Johnson, N. (2010). For instance, one can mention such a country as Rwanda in which Hutu political leaders provoked the ethnic genocide of Tutsi people (Chatterjee & Scheid, 2003, p. 5). It contains thousands of paper examples on a wide variety of topics, all donated by helpful students. This research paper on Military Interventions: Advantages and Disadvantages was written and submitted by your fellow One of the most notorious cases is the Rwandan Genocide which took place in 1994 (Schimmel, 2011). There are many complex reasons why humanitarian interventions often fail to create peace in the long-term. The U.S. has invaded several foreign countries during its history of interventionism. Arguments are often made for humanitarian interventions when there are reports of extensive and wide-spread human rights abuses. Military intervention can also have the disadvantage of hindering the efforts of humanitarian aid workers and NGOs. Russias intervention in the Syrian Civil War. This is why political leaders should be very careful while launching any form of intervention. Pros Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Seybolt, T. (2007). In the long term, this government can turn into an enemy of the United States and its allies (Seybolt, 2007, p. 3). A major argument against humanitarian interventions is that they can result in more deaths, not less. The first is the scale of the problem: not every repression is a genocide. Certainly, the U.S. troops succeeded in destroying the regime of Saddam Hussein. Operation Desert Fox against Iraq in 1998 employed a modest amount of air power for a short and arbitrary period of time with no goal other than to weaken the adversarys strength to some unspecified degree. Manokha, I. Additionally, it is possible that in the course of this ethnic conflict, a dictatorial and totalitarian government can come into power. These include the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Similarly, one should not forget about the Gulf War which also resulted in heavy losses. Panama, of course, proved a partial exception to these rules, but even there it took some two weeks to find and arrest Manuel Noriega even though more than 20,000 American soldiers were occupying the generals small country and faced little organized opposition. It is true that American interests in Kosovo were less than vital, and that persuading the American people and their elected representatives of the need to make large sacrifices, including casualties, would not have been easy. These include that they destabilise the country in which the military action is taken, a lack of proper planning following the intervention and systemic issues within the country that are not resolved by the removal of repressive regimes. Between 2006 and 2008, he was a public policy scholar when he wrote his fourth book, The Much Too Promised Land: America's Elusive Search for Arab-Israeli Peace. To have a nation militarily violate the sovereignty of another country is controversial. However, often there is wide spread agreement that the full motivation for the use of military force was aggression. Instead, the reason for delay should have been the absence of partners willing to bear the brunt of the operation, an obstacle that might have been overcome by more forceful diplomacy. In total, America has spent around 2.26 trillion USD in Afghanistan and 757.8 billion USD in Iraq. Paul Pillar (right), a former national intelligence officer, with teammate Aaron David Miller, argues that the U.S. should have a smaller military footprint in the Middle East. I feel like its a lifeline. Paul Pillar is a nonresident senior fellow at the Center for Security Studies of Georgetown University and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. As has been shown, air power is clearly limited in what it can be expected to accomplish. When it comes to humanitarian situations, several factors should influence the decision to intervene.
Lake Pontchartrain Bridge Deaths, Can A Teams Meeting Start Without The Organizer, Retired Bath And Body Works Scents, Dustin Milligan Partner, Nuffield Vasectomy Cost, Articles M